The latest disruption in Honda’s production lines isn’t just another blip in the ongoing global chip shortage. It’s a warning siren for the entire automotive industry, echoing far beyond Japan and China. What’s at play goes deeper than supply chains and manufacturing schedules—it’s a glimpse into how geopolitics can paralyze modern industry overnight.

Honda’s shutdowns—factories in Japan closed January 5-6, and all three Chinese Guangqi Honda plants idle December 29-January 2—show that the aftershocks of chip supply volatility aren’t going away. If anything, they’re intensifying, with new root causes few saw coming.
Why This Matters
- Manufacturing is now at the mercy of international politics. The Dutch government’s seizure of Nexperia, a Chinese-owned chipmaker in the Netherlands, triggered this latest crisis.
- Basic auto chips are now as strategically sensitive as high-end semiconductors. Nexperia doesn’t make bleeding-edge chips; it makes the “boring” ones that keep cars running—yet even these are pawns in a tech cold war.
- Supply chain fragility is still underestimated. Honda thought things would normalize by November. Instead, automakers remain at the whim of government chess moves.
What Most People Miss
- Many assume chip shortages are about consumer electronics or cutting-edge tech. In reality, the auto industry depends heavily on a steady flow of low-end chips—and these are just as vulnerable to disruption.
- The Dutch government cited “governance shortcomings” for the Nexperia seizure, but reports indicate this was more about geopolitics than genuine concern over technology transfer.
- Even after “constructive talks” and partial lifting of export controls, supply chains haven’t bounced back. Partial fixes aren’t enough in a hyper-globalized industry.
Key Takeaways
- Geopolitical risk is the new normal. Supply chains must build in resilience to political shocks, not just natural disasters or demand swings.
- Automakers can’t just wait for things to “return to normal.” They need to rethink where and how they source components, and diversify suppliers—no matter the cost.
- Governments are willing to intervene—hard. The Nexperia episode proves that international pressure can override commercial interests overnight.
Industry Context: How Did We Get Here?
- Since 2020, chip shortages have cost the global auto industry over $200 billion in lost revenue, according to AlixPartners.
- The auto sector’s “just-in-time” philosophy—once a model of efficiency—is now a glaring vulnerability. Inventory buffers and dual-sourcing are back in vogue.
- Other automakers, from Ford to Toyota, have faced similar shutdowns. This isn’t just a Honda problem—it’s systemic.
Timeline: The Nexperia Crisis Unfolded
- Oct 2025: Dutch government seizes Nexperia, citing pressure from the U.S. and national security concerns.
- Late Oct: China blocks exports of Nexperia chips in retaliation.
- Nov 2025: Automakers, including Honda, begin reporting new shortages and production delays.
- Dec 2025: After tense negotiations, the Netherlands partially lifts restrictions; China allows some exemptions, but the supply chain remains choked.
- Jan 2026: Honda shutters production in Japan and China as chips remain scarce.
Pros & Cons: Automakers’ Options Moving Forward
- Pros of Diversifying Suppliers: More resilience, less risk from any single country or policy.
- Cons: Higher costs, longer lead times, and potential quality trade-offs.
The Bottom Line
The next era of auto manufacturing will be defined by political as much as technical challenges. Companies that ignore the new geopolitical reality do so at their peril. Honda’s production pause is just the latest symptom—expect more volatility ahead unless the industry radically rethinks its approach to supply chains and risk.