Article Outline

Buick is charting a bold new course by shifting production of its next-generation compact SUV—from China to the heartland of America. This move isn’t just a change of scenery; it’s a seismic shift with implications for jobs, tariffs, and the future of the brand.

General Motors (GM) confirmed the successor to the Buick Envision will roll off the lines at the Fairfax plant in Kansas City, Kansas, starting in 2028. This new model will share its underpinnings with the Chevrolet Equinox, which itself is making the leap from Mexican to U.S. production in 2027. But why does this matter, and what could it mean for the industry?

Why This Matters

• Job Creation and Economic Impact: Bringing production stateside means more American jobs, revitalizing local economies, and strengthening the domestic auto supply chain.
• Tariff Avoidance: U.S. tariffs on Chinese-made vehicles have squeezed profits and complicated logistics for GM. Moving production home sidesteps these headaches.
• Political Optics: With trade tensions and election cycles, the optics of “Made in America” matter now more than ever—for both consumers and policymakers.

What Most People Miss

• Platform Synergy: The new Buick will share its platform with the Chevy Equinox, enabling cost efficiencies, faster innovation, and potentially improved quality.
• Brand Perception Upgrade: Buick, often associated with imported vehicles, now gets a “Buy American” marketing advantage that could resonate with skeptical buyers.
• Future-Proofing: The Fairfax plant’s pivot to both EVs (like the Chevy Bolt) and new crossovers signals GM’s strategic flexibility for whatever the auto market demands next.

Key Takeaways

• The next Buick compact SUV will be assembled in Kansas by 2028, possibly under a new name but still following Buick’s signature “En-” naming pattern.
• Despite being Buick’s third-best seller, the Envision moved over 40,000 units in each of the past three years—proof this is a high-stakes segment for the brand.
• Until domestic production ramps up, Buick will continue importing Envisions from China—highlighting the complexity and duration of automotive supply chain transitions.

Industry Context and Comparisons

• Trend: GM’s move echoes a broader industry shift. Ford and Stellantis have both announced plans to increase U.S. manufacturing, particularly for high-volume SUVs and EVs.
• Tariff Trouble: The Trump administration’s 2018 tariffs on imported Chinese vehicles (upwards of 27.5%) hit models like the Envision hard—making U.S. production a long-term necessity, not a choice.
• Platform Sharing: Automakers are increasingly leveraging shared platforms across brands (think Toyota RAV4 and Lexus NX) to optimize cost and speed to market—Buick and Chevy are following suit.

Pros and Cons Analysis

• Pros:
  • Job growth in U.S. manufacturing
  • Boosts “American-made” credentials for Buick
  • Reduced exposure to tariffs and international trade risks
• Cons:
  • Transition period means continued reliance on imports
  • Potentially higher production costs compared to China

The Bottom Line

Buick’s decision to bring its next compact SUV’s production to Kansas is more than a business move—it’s a strategic pivot responding to tariffs, market perceptions, and the evolving auto industry landscape. The real winners? American workers, Buick’s brand, and consumers who value home-grown vehicles.

Timeline: Buick’s Compact SUV Production Shift

• 2024: Announcement of U.S. production for Buick’s next compact SUV
• 2027: Chevy Equinox production begins at Fairfax, Kansas
• 2028: Next-generation Buick compact SUV hits the Fairfax assembly line

Action Steps for Consumers

• If you’re considering a Buick Envision in the next few years, know it’ll still be imported from China until 2028.
• Watch for updates on the new model’s features, name, and pricing as GM reveals more details closer to launch.
• Keep an eye on incentives for American-made vehicles—these often increase as new domestic production ramps up.

Sources:

• Car and Driver: Buick Moving Production of Next Compact SUV from China to U.S.
• Buick Envision Overview
• Chevy Equinox Overview
• 2027 Chevy Bolt EV Production News

Welcoming a new baby doesn’t just change your sleep schedule—it can overhaul your entire approach to cars. For many car enthusiasts, the birth of a child marks a rite of passage: trading in sporty coupes for practical family haulers. But as Tony Quiroga’s heartfelt editor’s letter in Car and Driver reveals, choosing the right family car is about more than just cup holders and cargo space.

This isn’t just a story about letting go of a beloved BMW for something more sensible—it’s a crash course in how priorities (and the car market) shift when a baby arrives.

Why This Matters

• The “family car” question is more relevant than ever as birth rates rise among older parents, many with established car preferences and unique needs.
• Car choices for new families are evolving: No longer just minivans, but a spectrum of SUVs, crossovers, and yes, even fast luxury wagons are on the table.
• Safety and practicality now lead the conversation, but the emotional connection to cars—and driving pleasure—still matters, even for parents.

What Most People Miss

• Fitting a rear-facing car seat is a game-changer: Many popular SUVs and sedans lose significant front passenger comfort when accommodating modern child seats. Always do a test fit before buying!
• “Family car” doesn’t mean boring: High-performance options like the Mercedes-Benz R63 AMG or Lexus LX570 can satisfy driving enthusiasts—if you’re willing to pay for maintenance and fuel.
• Features like analog gauges and CD players still matter to many parents, especially those who grew up with them. As automakers phase these out, finding the right balance of tech and tradition gets harder.

Key Takeaways from the Editor’s Search

• Kia Telluride: Practical, highly rated, and a modern staple—no wonder it’s a family favorite. But the 2026 model hiatus means some buyers will look elsewhere or wait for the 2027 redesign.
• Honda Passport: Fun to drive, comfortable, and cleverly designed for family accessories. Not the quickest, but a strong all-rounder for active parents.
• Toyota Sienna: Minivans like the Sienna offer unbeatable efficiency (30 mpg!) and room, but the “minivan stigma” still turns off some smaller families.
• Lexus LX570/Toyota Land Cruiser: Luxury, reliability, and presence—at the cost of serious fuel bills. The market’s love for Land Cruisers has driven prices above their Lexus cousins, a notable shift in resale trends.

Industry Context & Trends

• SUVs and crossovers now make up over 55% of US auto sales—up from just 36% a decade ago. The “family car” is no longer a sedan or minivan by default.
• Used car prices remain historically high for models like the Land Cruiser and LX570, fueled by reliability and scarcity.
• Automakers are phasing out CD players and analog gauges in favor of digital dashboards and streaming. For many parents, this means looking at older models or aftermarket upgrades.

Pros and Cons Analysis: Car Shopping with a Baby

• Pros:
  • Forces a realistic assessment of needs vs. wants (safety, space, comfort).
  • Often leads to discovering new favorites you’d never have considered pre-kid.
  • Can be an opportunity to upgrade technology and reliability.
• Cons:
  • May require letting go of beloved enthusiast cars.
  • Sticker shock—modern family vehicles can be pricey, especially used SUVs.
  • Some features you love (CD player, analog gauges) are getting harder to find.

Action Steps for New Parents Car Shopping

1. Test-fit your child seat(s) before buying—don’t trust specs alone.
2. Prioritize safety features: Top IIHS ratings, blind spot monitoring, adaptive cruise, etc.
3. Balance tech with comfort—decide what’s non-negotiable (e.g., analog controls, CD player).
4. Factor in long-term costs: Maintenance, insurance, fuel.
5. Don’t be afraid to challenge the minivan stigma—practicality is king, but fun is still possible!

The Bottom Line

Bringing a baby home means more than just installing a car seat—it’s a chance to rethink what you need (and want) from your vehicle. As this editor’s journey shows, you don’t have to sacrifice all your driving joy for practicality. The sweet spot? Finding a family car that’s as fun for you as it is safe and comfortable for your little one.

Sources:

• Kia Telluride Review
• Honda Passport Review
• Toyota Sienna Review
• Lexus LX570 Review
• Toyota Land Cruiser Review
• 2021 Toyota Sienna Long-Term Review
• Car and Driver Marketplace
• Source

Rivian’s latest patent filings aren’t just about a fancy rear window—they signal a potential sea change in how we interact with electric vehicles. While most headlines focus on the top-hinged, motorized rear glass, there’s a deeper layer here: a return to physical buttons and tactile controls in a world obsessed with touchscreens. Let’s break down why these details matter far more than you might think.

Why This Matters

• User Experience Revolution: The EV industry—Tesla, Rivian, even Ford—has been racing to stuff every control into a touchscreen. But drivers are rebelling. Nothing is more frustrating than hunting through digital menus just to adjust the AC or open the trunk. Rivian’s patent hints at a course correction, putting essential controls back at your fingertips—literally.
• Practicality Over Gimmicks: The independently powered rear glass isn’t just for show. Think of loading groceries, big dogs, or awkward cargo. It’s a feature beloved by Toyota Land Cruiser and Lexus GX owners. Rivian’s twist? They want it motorized for true one-hand (or no-hand, thanks to gesture control) operation. That’s a real upgrade for everyday life.
• Safety and Accessibility: Physical buttons can be operated by touch, without taking your eyes off the road. In an industry facing increasing scrutiny over distracted driving, Rivian’s pivot could set a new safety benchmark.

What Most People Miss

• Gesture Controls Are Coming: The patent isn’t just about buttons—it mentions camera-based gesture recognition. Rivian could blend the best of both worlds: tactile controls for driving, touchless controls for loading, all powered by smart sensors.
• It’s a Signal to the Market: Volkswagen’s $5 billion investment in Rivian was largely about software. Yet this patent signals Rivian isn’t married to digital-only UX. They’re listening to real-world feedback, which could influence other automakers to rethink their own strategies.
• Mid-Cycle Facelift Preview: The patent drawings offer a sneak peek at what the facelifted R1S or R1T could look like—a subtle but important detail for fans and investors tracking Rivian’s design evolution.

Key Takeaways

• Rivian could become the first major EV maker to bring back physical switchgear in a meaningful way—potentially setting a trend for the entire industry.
• The independently powered rear glass is more than a novelty—it’s a practical feature that addresses real customer pain points.
• Gesture-based controls could bring a new level of convenience, blending old-school tactile feedback with futuristic tech.

Industry Context: The Great Touchscreen Backlash

Recent J.D. Power studies show customer satisfaction with infotainment systems is declining—largely due to clunky, screen-based controls. Ford just released a Mustang with more physical knobs, and Porsche never abandoned them. There’s a growing realization: drivers want tactile feedback, especially for critical functions. Rivian’s patent is perfectly timed.

Comparisons and Trends

• Tesla: All-in on touchscreens, but facing lawsuits and criticism over safety and distraction.
• Land Cruiser & Lexus GX: Rear glass that opens separately is a fan favorite—Rivian’s powered version could set a new standard.
• Porsche, BMW: Both tout ‘driver-centric’ interiors with physical controls for essentials, and their owners love it.

Pros and Cons Analysis

• Pros: Easier, safer operation; more intuitive user experience; improved accessibility; unique feature set.
• Cons: Slightly increased manufacturing complexity; potential for more parts to break (though this is offset by user benefit).

Actionable Insights

• If you’re considering an EV, watch for models with real switchgear—they’re coming back for a reason.
• For automakers: Listen to your users. Sometimes, the old ways are best—especially when it comes to driving safety and convenience.

The Bottom Line

Rivian’s new patents aren’t just technical drawings—they’re a roadmap for a smarter, more user-friendly EV future. By blending tactile controls, gesture recognition, and practical features like motorized rear glass, Rivian is poised to leap ahead in both innovation and everyday usability. If the rest of the industry follows, the days of “screen rage” may be numbered.

Sources:

• Source
• Rivian R1S Overview
• Toyota Land Cruiser
• Lexus GX
• VW-Rivian Investment

In a move that’s got both Tesla fans and critics buzzing, Tesla has quietly discontinued its Basic Autopilot feature for new U.S. buyers—a staple that once set the brand apart. Now, if you want anything more than basic cruise control, be prepared to shell out $99 a month for Full Self-Driving (FSD). But what does this really mean for car buyers, Tesla’s position in the industry, and the evolution of assisted driving?

This isn’t just a minor tweak; it’s a fundamental shift in how Tesla monetizes its technology and how customers experience advanced driver assistance. Let’s break it all down.

Why This Matters

• Tesla is no longer including Autosteer (lane centering) as standard. Buyers are left with only Traffic-Aware Cruise Control unless they subscribe to FSD.
• The paywalling of basic safety features marks a new era of software-driven monetization in the auto industry.
• With FSD still in beta and not truly “full self-driving,” many feel they’re paying premium prices for features that are standard elsewhere.

What Most People Miss

• Tesla’s decision is a major outlier in the industry. Brands like Toyota, Honda, and even budget options from Hyundai and Kia include lane centering and adaptive cruise as standard on most models.
• This move could backfire. As mainstream automakers catch up on tech, Tesla risks losing its value proposition for entry-level buyers.
• In Europe, Tesla still offers Basic Autopilot as standard due to regulatory hurdles for FSD—a rare case where European buyers get a better deal than Americans.
• Transparency issues: Tesla’s online configurator now omits any mention of “Autopilot,” leaving customers in the dark unless they dig deep.

Key Takeaways

• Cost Creep: What was once free now costs $1,188 a year, or a one-time $8,000 (the latter soon to be discontinued).
• Value Questioned: With FSD still a work in progress, is the subscription worth it for everyday drivers who just want basic assistance?
• Market Impact: Tesla is betting drivers will pay for software, but some may simply look elsewhere—especially as federal and state incentives for EV adoption tighten.
• Regulatory Uncertainty: In Europe, Autopilot remains, but that could change if FSD is ever approved, potentially angering customers further.

Timeline: How Did We Get Here?

1. 2014–2019: Tesla includes Autopilot (Autosteer + adaptive cruise) as standard on all new cars.
2. 2020–2024: Enhanced Autopilot and FSD offered as paid upgrades, but basic features remain free.
3. 2026: Basic Autopilot removed in U.S.; only Traffic-Aware Cruise Control is standard. FSD subscription ramps up to $99/month.

Pros and Cons Analysis

• Pros:
  • Potentially faster software improvements funded by recurring revenue.
  • Premium buyers (Model S/X/Cyberbeast) get FSD included.
• Cons:
  • Entry-level buyers lose value—a key Tesla differentiator vanishes.
  • Subscription fatigue: Yet another monthly bill for features that are free elsewhere.
  • Could dampen Tesla’s brand appeal among first-time EV buyers.

Expert Insight

“Tesla pioneered the software-first approach in automotive, but removing core safety features from the standard package sets a precedent that rivals may exploit. If competitors offer more value for less, Tesla’s market share could erode—especially in the fiercely competitive sub-$40,000 segment.”

The Bottom Line

Tesla’s gamble may increase revenue from subscriptions, but it risks alienating budget-conscious buyers and ceding ground to rivals who are catching up fast on tech and value. The company’s next move—and its competitors’ response—could define the future of paid software in the car industry.

Sources:

• Source
• Tesla FSD subscription changes
• Tesla news on Mashable
• Elon Musk on FSD pricing
• European FSD petition

The 2027 Mazda CX-50 Hybrid has arrived, promising to blend Mazda’s signature handling with the eco-friendly appeal of a modern hybrid. But does this compact SUV really deliver the best of both worlds, or does the pursuit of efficiency come with some unexpected trade-offs? Let’s dig deeper than the spec sheet.

Why This Matters

• The CX-50 Hybrid is Mazda’s first hybrid compact SUV for North America, signaling a critical pivot toward electrification for a brand known for driving dynamics, not green tech.
• It leverages Toyota’s proven 219-hp hybrid system (from the RAV4 Hybrid), but attempts to inject Mazda personality into the mix.
• With a combined EPA rating of 38 mpg—12 mpg better than the standard CX-50—this is a major leap for fuel-conscious buyers, especially as gas prices remain unpredictable.

What Most People Miss

• The hybrid’s fuel economy comes with a less refined driving experience. Mazda fans expect zippy responses and smooth shifts. Instead, the Toyota-sourced CVT (continuously variable transmission) delivers more droning noise and less verve, especially during spirited acceleration.
• Cargo and rear-seat space are subpar for the segment. The CX-50 Hybrid trails both the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid and Honda CR-V Hybrid in practicality, fitting only 8 carry-ons behind the second row versus the RAV4’s 10.
• Towing capacity drops sharply—from 3,500 lbs in non-hybrids to just 1,500 lbs in the hybrid. If you plan on hauling, this is a significant limitation.

Key Takeaways

• Premium Feel: Mazda delivers a legitimate near-luxury interior, with even base trims featuring power seats, heated front seats, and a power liftgate. Premium trims rival luxury brands for materials and comfort.
• Infotainment & Safety: Standard 10.3″ touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, and a full suite of driver-assistance tech (lane-keeping, adaptive cruise, auto emergency braking).
• Performance: 0-60 mph in 7.6 seconds—quicker than the base gas CX-50, but a second slower than the turbo model. The driving feel is competent, but the CVT saps the fun.
• Real-World MPG: 34 mpg on the highway in Car and Driver’s testing (short of the RAV4’s 37 mpg in the same trial). EPA city/highway/combined: 39/37/38 mpg.
• Warranty: Mazda’s 3-year/36,000-mile limited and 5-year/60,000-mile powertrain warranties trail behind Kia and Hyundai, and there’s no complimentary maintenance.

Comparison Snapshot: CX-50 Hybrid vs. Rivals

• Toyota RAV4 Hybrid: Smoother powertrain, more cargo space, slightly better mileage, but less premium cabin feel.
• Honda CR-V Hybrid: Quieter and more spacious, better fuel economy, but arguably less fun to drive than the Mazda.
• Hyundai Tucson Hybrid & Kia Sportage Hybrid: Both offer longer warranties and more practical space, but don’t match the Mazda’s interior polish or steering feel.

Pros and Cons

• Pros:
  • Outstanding fuel economy for a compact SUV
  • Premium interior and well-equipped tech
  • Mazda’s trademark handling sharpness (to a point)
• Cons:
  • Noisy, less responsive hybrid powertrain
  • Limited cargo and rear-seat space
  • Reduced towing capability vs. gas model
  • Warranty lags behind class leaders

Timeline & Industry Context

• 2025: CX-50 Hybrid debuts using Toyota’s hybrid tech.
• 2027: Third model year—no major changes, but the hybrid remains crucial as Mazda electrifies its lineup in response to tightening emissions rules globally.
• Trend: Nearly every mainstream automaker now offers a hybrid compact SUV, as buyers demand efficiency without ditching SUVs for smaller sedans or full EVs.

Expert Commentary

“The CX-50 Hybrid is like a tailored suit with sneakers underneath—sophisticated on the surface, but not as poised when you push it. Mazda’s signature handling is still present, but the hybrid’s Toyota bones show through when you stomp on the gas. For buyers who want luxury and efficiency—but not the outright practicality or smoothness of a RAV4 or CR-V—it’s a unique choice.”

Action Steps & Practical Implications

• Test-drive the CX-50 Hybrid AND its rivals to see if you can live with the CVT’s quirks and the tighter cargo area.
• If towing or space is your top priority, look elsewhere. But if you want style, tech, and efficiency, the CX-50 Hybrid is compelling—especially in Premium trim.
• Monitor incentives and pricing—hybrid compact SUV deals are constantly changing as competition heats up.

The Bottom Line

The 2027 Mazda CX-50 Hybrid is for drivers who crave a touch of luxury and Mazda’s unique sense of style, but who are willing to trade some practicality and performance for big gains at the pump. It’s not for everyone, but for the right buyer, it’s a standout in a crowded field.

Sources:

• Source
• EPA’s website
• NHTSA
• IIHS
• Toyota RAV4 Hybrid
• Honda CR-V Hybrid

The 2026 Kia Sportage X-Pro is making headlines for its bolder looks and off-road promise, but is it really the sweet spot in the Sportage lineup—or just the model with the most attitude? Let’s dig into why this trim stands out, what most reviews gloss over, and what it means for buyers in the ever-evolving compact SUV market.

Why This Matters

• Compact SUVs are now the hottest battleground for automakers, with buyers demanding versatility, efficiency, and style. The Sportage X-Pro attempts to carve out a niche for adventurous drivers who want more than just a family hauler.
• Kia’s confidence in the X-Pro signals a shift toward rugged trims—a trend seen across the industry, from Subaru’s Wilderness models to Toyota’s TRD Pro lineup. It’s not just about looks; it’s about selling the idea of adventure, even if most buyers never leave the pavement.

Key Takeaways

• The X-Pro is available exclusively with the top Prestige trim and a 187-hp 2.5L four-cylinder with eight-speed automatic—no hybrid option here.
• It shares its 8.3 inches of ground clearance with other AWD Sportages, meaning it looks tough but doesn’t go further… literally.
• Unique to the X-Pro: Heated windshield and washer nozzles, plus BFGoodrich all-terrain tires—a first in the lineup.
• Ironically, the hybrid X-Line offers more power (232 hp) and 46% better fuel economy (an 11-mpg bump), all while costing less than the X-Pro.
• The X-Pro is not the value leader—you’re paying for style and image, not outright performance or efficiency.

What Most People Miss

• Tires make the difference: The biggest mechanical distinction is the BFGoodrich all-terrain rubber. For real off-roaders, this upgrade is useful—better grip on loose surfaces, but noisier and less fuel-efficient on the highway.
• The heated windshield and washer nozzles are practical cold-climate perks—features not found on other Sportage models, adding real-world winter value that’s easy to overlook.
• Despite the rugged look, actual off-road enhancements are minimal. No extra suspension travel, no locking diffs, and the same AWD system as other trims.

Industry Context & Comparison

• Rugged trims are red-hot: Ford Bronco Sport Badlands, Subaru Forester Wilderness, and Toyota RAV4 Adventure all offer similar “adventure-lite” packages. It’s a marketing arms race for the outdoorsy urbanite.
• Kia’s approach is more about appearance than capability, but that’s in line with where most buyers are—wanting the look, not necessarily the ability.
• Fuel economy is a missed opportunity: As gas prices fluctuate and electrification expands, the lack of a hybrid X-Pro is a notable omission—especially since the hybrid X-Line is both more powerful and more efficient.

Pros and Cons

• Pros:
  • Distinctive styling and rugged appeal
  • Heated windshield and washer nozzles—great for winter
  • All-terrain tires for light off-road use
• Cons:
  • No hybrid option, despite demand
  • Price premium over more powerful, efficient trims
  • Off-road upgrades are mostly cosmetic

The Bottom Line

The 2026 Kia Sportage X-Pro is all about image—aimed at buyers who want to look ready for the trail, even if their wildest adventure is the grocery store parking lot after a snowstorm. For those who prioritize efficiency or true off-road chops, other Sportage trims or even rival models might be a better fit. Still, if you want your compact SUV to stand out in the suburban jungle, the X-Pro delivers a dose of style and practicality that most people will notice—even if the trail doesn’t.

Action Steps for Shoppers

1. Decide if you want looks or substance: Is off-road style or hybrid performance your priority?
2. Compare pricing and features with hybrid X-Line and competitor models.
3. If you live in a snowy climate, appreciate the heated glass and washer nozzles—those aren’t just for show!

Sources:

• Source

Car culture has always had its icons, but few vehicles hold the universal, cross-generational love like the fourth-gen Honda Civic EF. Now, Hot Wheels is tapping into the collective ’90s nostalgia with its new buildable Brick Shop kit—and the implications go far beyond just another toy on the shelf.

This isn’t just a collector’s item. It’s a celebration of everyday car culture, accessibility, and the rise of customization in a world once dominated by exotic supercars. Alongside the Civic EF, Hot Wheels also unveiled a 2007 S2000 kit, but let’s break down why these Hondas matter in 2024—and what the toy industry and auto enthusiasts can learn from this launch.

Why This Matters

• Democratizing Car Fandom: Not everyone can own a Lamborghini or a GT-R, but many have real, lived experiences with Civics and S2000s. This kit celebrates cars that built communities, not just dreams.
• Blurring Toy and Hobbyist Lines: With 248–257 pieces, swappable wheel covers, and aftermarket decals from legends like Sparco and K&N, this is more than a simple toy—it’s a gateway to car modding culture for a new generation.
• Nostalgia Meets Modern Customization: The ’90s Civic EF in Tahitian Green Pearl and yellow S2000 aren’t just accurate—they’re love letters to an era when tuning and personalization went mainstream.

What Most People Miss

• First Hondas in the Brick Shop Series: It’s easy to overlook, but this is a debut for Honda in Mattel’s buildable lineup. The choice signals growing recognition of JDM (Japanese Domestic Market) icons as global cultural touchstones.
• The Aftermarket Angle: Including real-world decals from aftermarket brands isn’t just a nod to accuracy—it’s validation of tuning culture as a legitimate, celebrated part of car history.
• Sold-Out Status: The Civic EF kit sold out almost instantly. That speaks volumes about the pent-up demand for relatable, attainable car icons—especially from millennials and Gen Z who grew up with these models.

Key Takeaways

• Mainstream Brands Are Embracing Everyday Enthusiasts: This isn’t about supercar envy—it’s about celebrating the cars we actually drive, modify, and love.
• Customization Is Here to Stay: Swappable parts and real-world decals point to a future where even toys are built to be personalized, reflecting the broader trend in car culture.
• Nostalgia Sells, But Only When It’s Authentic: Hot Wheels nailed the details—from paint codes to wheel options—showing that authenticity matters to today’s buyers.

Industry Context & Comparisons

• Lego vs. Hot Wheels Brick Shop: While Lego has dabbled in car models, Mattel’s approach is more focused on real-world tuners and customization. It’s a smart move, given the explosion of modding culture on platforms like Instagram and TikTok.
• JDM Wave: The inclusion of the Civic EF and S2000 is the latest in a line of JDM appreciation—from Lego’s Nissan Skyline GT-R sets to Forza’s car packs—reflecting a shift in what defines ‘iconic’.
• Price Point: At $22, these kits are accessible, especially compared to high-end Lego sets or diecast collectibles, broadening the hobbyist base.

Timeline: The Rise of JDM in Pop Culture

1. 1990s: Civic EF and S2000 become modding favorites worldwide, driven by affordability and tunability.
2. 2000s: JDM culture explodes in the West, thanks to movies like “Fast & Furious” and games like “Gran Turismo” and “Need for Speed”.
3. 2020s: Major toy brands embrace JDM icons, signaling their place in the global pantheon of beloved cars.

Pros & Cons of the Brick Shop Honda Kits

• Pros:
  • Authentic details (paint, decals, wheels)
  • Affordable entry point for new enthusiasts
  • Supports creativity and car culture learning
• Cons:
  • Limited availability (Civic sold out fast)
  • Some purists may want even more detailed customization

The Bottom Line

Hot Wheels’ new Brick Shop Honda kits aren’t just toys—they’re cultural artifacts. They recognize that the cars we grew up with, tinkered on, and drove to school are worthy of celebration. In a world where authenticity and relatability are more valuable than ever, Mattel’s move is a smart bet on the future of both the car hobby and the toy industry.

Sources:

• Car and Driver: Hot Wheels Brick Shop Honda Kits
• Mattel – S2000 Kit
• Mattel – Civic Kit

The electric SUV segment is about to get a major shake-up. Volvo’s all-new 2028 EX60 doesn’t just fill a gap in the automaker’s lineup—it’s poised to set standards that competitors can’t ignore. As the middle child between the compact EX40 and flagship EX90, the EX60 brings Scandinavian minimalism, impressive range, and serious power to a market hungry for both style and substance.

But what makes the EX60 truly stand out isn’t just its numbers—though they’re impressive. It’s how Volvo is blending premium features, everyday usability, and forward-thinking tech in a package that feels both aspirational and attainable.

Why This Matters

• Mainstream EVs are getting serious: With a projected range of up to 400 miles and a starting price around $60,000, the EX60 directly targets buyers who want luxury without going full Tesla or Mercedes-Benz.
• Volvo’s EV strategy is taking shape: The EX60’s arrival cements Volvo’s commitment to electrification, sitting right between their smaller city SUVs and the ultra-luxe EX90.
• Cross Country is back—electric style: The return of the Cross Country trim, with its increased ride height and off-road flavor, gives Volvo a unique edge in the electric adventure SUV market, a niche few legacy brands are addressing.

What Most People Miss

• Charging game-changer: All EX60s come with a NACS charging port, granting access to Tesla’s Supercharger network—the gold standard for EV charging in North America. This is a huge practical advantage over many rivals still stuck with slower or less reliable networks.
• Battery variety for real-world use: The EX60 offers three battery sizes (80, 91, and 112 kWh) and three powertrains. This isn’t just spec-sheet bragging—it means buyers can actually tailor their SUV to their lifestyle and budget.
• Interior focus on minimalism—at a cost? The touchscreen-centric dashboard looks sleek, but as many drivers know, relying on screens for basic controls can be distracting and less intuitive while driving. Volvo is betting big on tech—but will it alienate traditionalists?

Key Takeaways & Analysis

• Performance for everyone: From 369hp in the P6 to a wild 670hp in the P12, there’s a powertrain for every driver. The P10 Plus trim, with 503hp and 300–320 miles of range, is likely the sweet spot for most.
• Scandinavian design meets utility: The EX60’s minimalist interior, ample cargo space (up to 64.3 cu ft), and thoughtful features like wireless charging and rear climate controls show Volvo’s attention to both style and function.
• Safety stays king: True to Volvo’s brand, the EX60 comes loaded with driver aids—automated emergency braking, lane keeping, adaptive cruise, and more. Expect top marks from NHTSA and IIHS, keeping Volvo’s safety heritage alive in the EV era.
• Warranty peace of mind: 4 years/50,000 miles for most systems, 8 years/100,000 miles for the battery, plus 3 years/36,000 miles of free maintenance. That’s competitive with the best in the premium EV space.

How Does It Compare?

• Tesla Model Y: Tesla’s range and charging infrastructure are similar, but the EX60 offers more luxury and arguably better build quality, plus the Cross Country’s off-road readiness.
• BMW iX3 and Mercedes EQE SUV: Both German options bring luxury, but Volvo’s minimalist design, superior safety tech, and extended range (for the P12) give it an edge for buyers prioritizing practicality over badge prestige.
• Rivian R1S and Polestar 3: Both offer adventurous spirit and strong performance, but Volvo’s warranty, maintenance, and safety record could tip the scales for family buyers.

Timeline: Volvo’s Electric Evolution

1. 2022–2026: Volvo expands its EV range, launching EX40 and EX90.
2. 2027: EX60 debuts (standard model).
3. 2028: Cross Country EX60 arrives, bringing off-road flair to the lineup.

Pros & Cons

• Pros: Best-in-class range (for P12), NACS charging, safety features, luxury appointments, competitive warranty, off-road Cross Country option.
• Cons: Touchscreen-heavy controls may frustrate some drivers, pricing can escalate quickly with options, real-world range and performance still untested.

The Bottom Line

The 2028 Volvo EX60 is more than just a new electric SUV—it’s a statement. Volvo’s blend of Scandinavian design, safety innovation, and practical luxury sets it apart from the electric crowd. With the EX60, Volvo isn’t just following the EV trend—they’re helping define what a mainstream electric luxury SUV should be.

Action Steps for Shoppers

• Compare EX60 trims and battery options to see what fits your lifestyle best.
• Factor in Volvo’s charging advantage with NACS/Tesla access.
• Consider the Cross Country if you want capability beyond city streets.
• Watch for further updates as real-world testing data becomes available.

Sources:

• Source
• NHTSA
• IIHS

In a surprising but telling move, Mazda has decided to delay its next electric vehicle (EV) launch from 2027 to at least 2029. While this might just sound like another product delay in an era of shifting automotive priorities, there’s a lot more going on beneath the hood. Mazda isn’t just stalling—it’s recalibrating its entire strategy amid an EV market that’s far less predictable than it seemed a few years ago.

Let’s unpack why this matters for Mazda, for car buyers, and for the auto industry at large. Spoiler alert: this isn’t just about batteries and release dates—it’s about survival, regulation, and the real-world pace of electrification.

Why This Matters

• Mazda’s delay is part of a broader industry reckoning with the realities of EV demand, infrastructure, and government policy shifts.
• The pivot to hybrids is a strategic hedge, recognizing that consumers aren’t ready to go all-in on EVs—especially as federal incentives dry up and tariffs make imports pricier.
• It signals that even as governments push for electrification, automakers with smaller budgets and narrower margins (like Mazda) are forced to play the long game, focusing on near-term profitability and consumer preference.

What Most People Miss

• Mazda’s EV history in the U.S. is, to put it politely, underwhelming. The MX-30, with its 100-mile range, barely made a splash—sold only in California and quickly discontinued. This wasn’t just a flop; it was a warning sign for the brand.
• U.S. regulatory changes have real bite. The Trump administration’s tariffs and the phase-out of federal EV tax credits in 2025 have made the business case for new EVs far tougher, especially for brands importing vehicles from Japan.
• Mazda’s new hybrid tech isn’t just a stopgap. The upcoming four-cylinder hybrid system—debuting in the best-selling CX-5 in 2027—could be a make-or-break moment. If Mazda can deliver Toyota-like reliability with a more engaging drive, it could carve out a lucrative niche.

Key Takeaways

• Mazda originally targeted 25–40% global EV sales by 2030, but now expects to fall short of that mark.
• The new Mazda EV, spotted in SUV form, won’t land until 2029 at the earliest—and only if market conditions improve.
• Hybrids are the immediate future for Mazda in the U.S., with a homegrown system coming to the CX-5. Existing hybrids (CX-50, CX-70, CX-90) already tap into Toyota and plug-in tech.
• Industry-wide, this is a red flag for those betting on a quick EV takeover. Consumers, especially outside urban coastal markets, still want affordable, reliable cars—hybrids hit that sweet spot.

Industry Context & Comparisons

• Other automakers are also pumping the brakes: GM, Ford, and Volkswagen have all slowed some EV launches or re-upped investment in hybrids.
• U.S. EV sales growth has cooled in 2024, with inventories rising and price cuts becoming more common. According to Cox Automotive, EVs made up 7.6% of new car sales in 2023, but that rate is projected to stagnate or even dip in the near term.
• Toyota’s hybrid dominance has proven that consumers want electrification without the range anxiety and charging headaches. Mazda seems to be taking a page from this playbook—perhaps a wise move for a brand with less room for error.

Pros & Cons of Mazda’s Pivot

• Pros:
  • Lower risk and development costs in a volatile market
  • Better alignment with consumer preferences today
  • Potential to capitalize on hybrid demand while others chase EV unicorns
• Cons:
  • Potential to fall behind if/when EV adoption accelerates again
  • Risk of appearing out of step with regulators and green consumer sentiment

The Bottom Line

Mazda’s EV delay isn’t a retreat—it’s a recalibration. The brand is focusing on what it does best: building reliable, fun-to-drive cars that real people want (and can afford) right now. The hybrid-first strategy could buy Mazda the time it needs to develop a competitive EV—without betting the farm. For buyers, expect more hybrid choices with Mazda’s signature style and handling. For the industry, this is a case study in pragmatic adaptation, not defeatism.

Sources:

• Source
• Automotive News
• Mazda CX-5
• CX-50 Hybrid
• CX-70 Hybrid
• CX-90 Hybrid

The arrival of the 2026 Ford Mustang Dark Horse SC isn’t just about a new badge or another limited-edition pony car—it’s a seismic statement in the world of American performance. Ford’s latest high-octane Mustang, with its supercharged V8 and track-bred upgrades, signals a bold future for combustion thrill-seekers, even as the wider industry pivots toward electrification.

Let’s break down why the Dark Horse SC isn’t just a Shelby GT500 successor—it’s a shot across the bow to every automaker still playing in the muscle car arena.

Why This Matters

• A New Benchmark for American Muscle: With the Dodge Challenger Hellcat and Chevy Camaro bowing out, the Mustang stands nearly alone. The Dark Horse SC’s focus on both raw power and track refinement sets a new north star for the segment.
• Proof That V8s Aren’t Dead (Yet): Despite mounting EV pressure, Ford is doubling down with a supercharged 5.2-liter V8. Expect output somewhere between the last GT500’s 760 hp and the Mustang GTD’s 815 hp.
• Track-Ready, Not Just Dragstrip-Ready: The car’s aerodynamics, rear diffuser, and standard MagneRide suspension prove Ford is chasing lap times, not just stoplight heroics.

What Most People Miss

• The Evolution of Aerodynamics: The SC’s aggressive front splitter, huge rear wing, and ducktail spoiler aren’t just for show. They’re a deliberate response to the GTD’s lessons from IMSA and Le Mans programs—think real downforce, real cooling, real lap time improvement.
• Material Science on Display: The optional carbon-fiber wheels and advanced aluminum components aren’t typical Mustang fare. Ford’s leveraging tech from its racing efforts to deliver tangible performance gains—less unsprung mass, more grip.
• Standard MagneRide Is a Game-Changer: Previously a pricey add-on, MagneRide adaptive suspension is now standard. It’s the secret sauce for daily drivability and track domination, a rarity in this price bracket.

Key Takeaways

• The Dark Horse SC is the most hardcore Mustang outside Ford’s GTD program.
• Horsepower figures are hush-hush, but all evidence suggests 750–800 hp—making it a true Shelby GT500 successor.
• Track Pack buyers get carbon wheels, sticky tires, and that wild aero kit—making it a genuine circuit contender, not just a weekend toy.
• It’s slated for a summer 2026 launch, giving Ford time to dial in the details and stir up plenty of anticipation.

How It Compares: The Muscle Car Landscape in 2026

• Chevrolet Camaro: Discontinued after 2024. Rumors swirl of an EV successor, but nothing confirmed.
• Dodge Challenger: Hellcat and V8 models out of production, replaced by the all-electric Charger Daytona SRT.
• Mustang GTD: Even more extreme, but with a sky-high price tag and limited availability.
• Dark Horse SC may be the last great V8 Mustang before Ford’s own electrified transition. If you want analog thrills, this is it.

Pros and Cons: 2026 Mustang Dark Horse SC

• Pros:
  • Supercharged V8 with likely 750+ hp
  • Track-focused aerodynamics and suspension
  • Optional carbon-fiber wheels and race-grade tires
  • Heritage styling with modern muscle
• Cons:
  • No official horsepower numbers yet
  • Could be pricey, especially with Track Pack
  • Gas-powered future is uncertain in the long run

The Bottom Line

The 2026 Ford Mustang Dark Horse SC isn’t just a muscle car for the sake of nostalgia—it’s a swan song for the golden era of American V8 performance. For enthusiasts who feel left behind by the EV tide, this car is Ford’s way of saying, “Not so fast.” It’s the Mustang distilled, supercharged, and honed for a new generation of speed junkies.

Timeline: Mustang Performance Evolution

• 2020: Shelby GT500 launches with 760 hp.
• 2023: Mustang GTD revealed, pushing 815 hp and $300K+ price tag.
• 2026: Dark Horse SC brings supercharged power and track focus at (hopefully) a more attainable price.

Action Steps for Enthusiasts

1. Follow Ford’s updates for final horsepower and pricing details.
2. Watch for pre-order windows—these will go fast.
3. If you want the ultimate experience, budget for the Track Pack.
4. Get ready for one of the last great V8 Mustangs to ever hit the streets.

Sources:

• Source